Abstract

In comparative modeling, the quality of amino acid sequence alignment still constitutes a major bottleneck in the generation of high quality models of protein three-dimensional (3D) structures. Substantial efforts have been made to improve alignment quality by revising the substitution matrix, introducing multiple sequences, replacing dynamic programming with hidden Markov models, and incorporating 3D structure information. Improvements in the gap penalty have not been a major focus, however, following the development of the affine gap penalty and of the secondary structure dependent gap penalty. We revisited the correlation between protein 3D structure and gap location in a large protein 3D structure data set, and found that the frequency of gap locations approximated to an exponential function of the solvent accessibility of the inserted residues. The nonlinearity of the gap frequency as a function of accessibility corresponded well to the relationship between residue mutation pattern and residue accessibility. By introducing this relationship into the gap penalty calculation for pairwise alignment between template and target amino acid sequences, we were able to obtain a sequence alignment much closer to the structural alignment. The quality of the alignments was substantially improved on a pair of sequences with identity in the “twilight zone” between 20 and 40%. The relocation of gaps by our new method made a significant improvement in comparative modeling, exemplified here by the Bacillus subtilis yitF protein. The method was implemented in a computer program, ALAdeGAP (ALignment with Accessibility dependent GAp Penalty), which is available at http://cib.cf.ocha.ac.jp/target_protein/. Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Highlights

  • Most of the proteins perform their function after forming their three-dimensional (3D) structures

  • Implementation of the gap penalty into standard sequence alignment method We developed a program for pairwise amino acid sequence alignment based on the assumption that one of the sequences has a known 3D structure and the other does not

  • We could not find any obvious relationship between gap accessibility and, for instance, secondary structure that may account for the observed change in slope in figure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most of the proteins perform their function after forming their three-dimensional (3D) structures. Knowledge of protein 3D structure is, essential for understanding the mechanisms of protein function in atomic detail.[1] a large number of protein structures have been determined systematically by struc-. Gap Relocation in Sequence Alignment tural genomics projects,[2,3] with the goal of elucidating the function of proteins known from genome sequences. Template-based comparative modeling, based on protein family classification, is currently the most promising method for narrowing the gap between the number of structure known and unknown proteins.[6,7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.