Abstract

Simple SummaryTemperament is a key issue in beef cattle production systems, as it defines the responses of animals to human handling and to potentially challenging or fear-eliciting situations. However, little is known about how farmers define or assess temperament. Focus group discussions were carried out in order to analyze the perceptions of farmers regarding a series of temperament traits of animals, focusing on the Pyrenean cattle breed. Farmers described animal temperament using several adjectives such as “strong”, “aggressive”, “nervous”, “fearful”, “brave”, or “smart”, which account for their integrative vision of this concept. They reported a differential long-term development of the temperament of cows and bulls and mentioned that external features are not reliable indicators of temperament as compared with animal behavior. Sensory acuity, such as sight, hearing, and smell, were thought to be related to temperament. The results of this study are useful to better understand the decisions of farmers about cattle buying, selling, or culling, and their perspective about temperament should be considered in the research and design of genetic improvement schemes.Understanding temperament is an important part of cattle production since undesirable temperament may cause serious problems associated with aggression, maternal care, and human safety. However, little is known about how farmers define or assess temperament, especially in autochthonous cattle breeds. The aim of this study was to explore perceptions of farmers about the temperament of the Pyrenean cattle breed with special attention to beef cow-calf systems in Spain. The methodology used to obtain the information was focus group discussions (FGD). Farmers defined temperament as a behavioural response to challenging situations imposed by human handling. Specific terms used were related to active or passive reactions to fear (e.g., “strong”, “aggressive”, “nervous”, “fearful”). The speed of response to stimuli was also important. Female temperament was thought to become more docile with age while bull temperament was more variable. Maternal aggressiveness was highlighted as a potential human safety problem, but also desirable in an extensively bred animal who may need to defend calves against predators. Anatomical characteristics were seen as unreliable predictors of temperament, while behavioural indicators were more widely used, such as “alertness”, which was a general trait of the breed, and “gaze”, which, when associated with an alert expression, suggests a potential threat. Sensory acuity, such as sight and smell, were thought to be related with temperament in some FGDs but there was no overall agreement as to whether different behavioural responses were due to differences in sensory acuity. The results from the study could be useful during training programs or in the development of new genetic selection schemes and evaluation protocols involving cattle temperament.

Highlights

  • The study of individual differences in animal behavior that are consistent across contexts and across time is wide-spread throughout animal sciences, giving rise to terms such as animal temperament, personality or coping styles [1,2,3]

  • Results from all focus group discussions (FGD) agree with scientific evidence that asserts that maternal aggressiveness is a critical point for human safety that can be related with other maternal care traits and behavioral reactions to different handling practices [54,55]

  • The association between coat colour and temperament has been discussed in some beef cattle breeds [49], but there was no consensus in any FGD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of individual differences in animal behavior that are consistent across contexts and across time is wide-spread throughout animal sciences, giving rise to terms such as animal temperament, personality or coping styles [1,2,3]. The study of temperament has focused on analyzing behavioral responses of animals to potentially fear-eliciting or challenging situations related to production conditions, including responses to human handling [5]. Widespread attention has been given to the relationship between cattle temperament and the response to specific (human) handling practices, heritability, and some productive parameters [10,11]. Human-centered research has focused on identifying certain management practices, attitudes, and other characteristics of stock people that may be linked to different facets of animal behavior and welfare [12,13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call