Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Getting It Right the Second Time

Abstract

Hip arthroscopy procedures have become increasingly common in the last few decades for treating both intra- and extra-articular hip pathologies. Despite advancements in the field, some patients may not experience improvement and may eventually require revision hip arthroscopy. The multifactorial causes for failure, unknown impacts of the primary procedure and previous iatrogenic considerations can create added complexity for the revision. Given that revision hip arthroscopy has had more variation in patient outcomes and higher rates of subsequent conversion to hip arthroplasty, compared with primary hip arthroscopy, it is imperative to have a good algorithm for patient selection and to understand the various surgical options available to address different pathologies. In this review, we explore the current diagnostic algorithms, etiologies, surgical procedures, outcomes, and provide insights into future directions in the field of revision hip arthroscopy.