Abstract
The review process of our publications affects almost all SEG members. As authors, some have received manuscript reviews containing a recommendation for rejection or substantial revision—sometimes after many months of delay. As readers, we have struggled through syntaxically challenged manuscripts in search of new and innovative technology. The review process seeks to solve the latter problem for the reader at the risk of creating problems for the author. In essence, the process is a filter placed on manuscripts submitted for publication. It seeks to optimize timely technology transfer and readability while maintaining technical correctness. Since most SEG members have been readers and/or authors of SEG publications, it is worth revisiting.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
