Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) battery architectures have been envisioned to enable high energy density electrodes without the associated power drop experienced by planar cells. However, the development of 3D cells is hampered by difficulties producing conformal solid-state electrolytes (SSE), solid polymer electrolytes (SPE) and gel polymer electrolytes (GPE) that are pinhole-free and have adequate ionic conductivities. Fortunately, electrolytes in 3D cells are often utilized at lower thickness, which may compensate the decreased ionic conductivity. Here, we comprehensively review potential 3D SSE, SPE and GPE electrolyte materials by compiling their thickness and room temperature ionic conductivity. We use area specific resistance (ASR) as a metric to compare 3D electrolytes with one another and conventional electrolytes. We find that certain process-material combinations, such as atomic layer deposition of SSEs, electrodeposition of SPEs and GPEs, and initiated chemical vapor deposition of SPEs demonstrate ASRs beneath the interfacial impedances of Li-based systems and approach state-of-the-art electrolytes. We also comment on additional factors, such as electrochemical stability, that should be evaluated when determining 3D electrolyte suitability. Future research should focus on adapting known materials chemistries for conformal deposition techniques to further improve the ionic conductivity, as these techniques are capable of producing the necessary thicknesses and conformality.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call