Abstract

Gas-condensate flow is a critical process in the near-well region where the well production efficiency is strongly affected by the production of condensate dropout. Pore-scale simulations have provided an understanding of the underlying processes such as snap-off and the effect of the interplay between viscous and capillary forces on gas-condensate flow and its induced blockage within the pore spaces. Among various modeling approaches used to explore these phenomena, pore-network modeling, due to its computational efficiency and the ability to simulate relatively large sample sizes, has appealed to researchers. This article presents a review of the development of pore-network models to simulate gas-condensate flow, particularly in the near wellbore regions. This contribution reviews pore-scale mechanisms that should be included in simulating the gas-condensate flow, together with the involved processes and the peculiarities pertinent to such modeling efforts.After a brief review of different pore scale studies and their differences, advantages, and disadvantages, the review focuses on pore-network modeling, and the application of pore-network modeling in gas-condensate flow in the recent studies. The employed methodologies, highlights, and limitations of each pore network study are examined and critically discussed. The review addresses pore-space evolution, flow mechanisms, and the involved flow and transport parameters. The formulations of capillary entry pressure in different pore geometries, the corresponding conductance terms, snap-off criteria, and conditions for the creation of condensate bridging in different pore structures are presented. Additionally, three major approaches used in pore-network modeling of gas condensation, namely quasi-static, dynamic methods and dynamic compositional pore-network modeling, are presented and their main governing equations are provided using various tables. Finally, the significance of gas-condensate flow modeling including its modeling challenges together with the main similarities and differences among pore-network studies are provided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call