Review of WAG Field Experience

Abstract

Abstract In recent years there has been an increasing interest in water-alternating-gas (WAG) processes, both miscible and immiscible. WAG injection is an oil recovery method initially aimed to improve sweep efficiency during gas injection. In some recent applications produced hydrocarbon gas has been re-injected in water injection wells with the aim of improving oil recovery and pressure maintenance. Oil recovery by WAG has been attributed to contact of unswept zones, especially recovery of attic or cellar oil by exploiting the segregation of gas to the top or accumulating of water towards the bottom. Since the residual oil after gas flooding is normally lower than the residual oil after water flooding, and three-phase zones may obtain lower remaining oil saturation, water- alternating-gas has potential for increased microscopic displacement efficiency. WAG injection, thus, can lead to improved oil recovery by combining better mobility control and contacting unswept zones, and also leading to improved microscopical displacement. This study is a review of the WAG field experience as it is found in the literature today from the first reported WAG in 1957 in Canada and up to new experience from the North Sea. About 60 fields have been reviewed. Both onshore and offshore projects have been included, as well as WAG with hydrocarbon or non-hydrocarbon gases. Wellspacing is very different from onshore projects (where fine patterns often are applied) to offshore projects (well spacing in the order of 1000 meters). For the fields reviewed, a common trend for the successful injections is an increased oil recovery in the range of 5-10 per cent of the OIIP. Very few field trials have been reported as unsuccessful, but operational problems are often commented. Though, the injectivity and production problems are generally not detrimental for the WAG process, special attention has been given to breakthrough of injected phases (water or gas). Improved oil recovery by WAG is discussed as influenced by rock type, injection strategy, miscible/immiscible gas, and well spacing. P. 357