Abstract

Emerging 3rd generation photovoltaic technologies such as perovskite and dye-sensitized solar cells are very attractive for commercialization mainly due to their low-cost materials and fabrication processes. The main drawback of these devices is their poor long-term stability. To increase the long-term stability of these devices, a hermetic encapsulation is required. The hermeticity of encapsulated devices are measured and characterized using hermeticity tests according to standard test procedures. A review of the several techniques to measure the hermeticity is presented, addressing the test methods, limitations and applicability to perovskite and dye-sensitized solar cells glass frit encapsulated devices.

Highlights

  • Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) and perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are included in the emerging third generation of PV technologies

  • Conventional DSSCs are prepared on conductive glass substrates and consist of a photoanode, a dye, an electrolyte, and a counter electrode

  • PSCs are typically fabricated on conductive glass substrates and comprise several layers: an electron transport layer (ETL), a mesoporous scaffold, a perovskite light absorber, a hole transport layer (HTL) and a back contact (Leijtens et al 2015)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) and perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are included in the emerging third generation of PV technologies. Used sealant materials include thermo-plastics such as surlynTM, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and UV and thermal cure epoxy resins These materials cannot provide long-term airtight encapsulation (Matteocci et al 2016). Glass frit materials have good wettability to most surfaces and can bond rough surfaces (Knechtel 2005) These materials are inert, provide an airtight encapsulation and have high bonding strength (Knechtel 2015). These properties make glass frits one of the most ideal sealant material to encapsulate technologies that require hermetic encapsulation, such as the third generation of PV technologies (Emami et al 2020). A review of the several leak rate measurements methods is presented in this work and their applicability to third generation of PV technologies is discussed

Understanding Leakage Mechanisms
Perfluorocarbon gross leak test
Fine leak tests
Krypton-85 radioactive tracer gas test
Optical leak test
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.