Abstract

Building structures are vulnerable to the shocks caused by earthquakes. Buildings that have been destroyed by an earthquake are very detrimental in terms of material loss and mental trauma. However, technological developments now enable us to anticipate shocks from earthquakes and minimize losses. One of the technologies that has been used, and is currently being further developed, is a damping device that is fitted to the building structure. There are various types of damping devices, each with different characteristics and systems. Multiple studies on damping devices have resulted in the development of various types, such as friction dampers (FDs), tuned mass dampers (TMDs), and viscous dampers (VDs). However, studies on attenuation devices are mostly based on the type of system and can be divided into three categories, namely passive, active, and semi-active. As such, each type and system have their own advantages and disadvantages. This study investigated the efficacy of a magnetorheological (MR) damper, a viscous-type damping device with a semi-active system, in a simulation that applied the damper to the side of a building structure. Although MR dampers have been extensively used and developed as inter-story damping devices, very few studies have analyzed their models and controls even though both are equally important in controlled dampers for semi-active systems. Of the various types of models, the Bingham model is the most popular as indicated by the large number of publications available on the subject. Most models adapt the Bingham model because it is the most straightforward of all the models. Fuzzy controls are often used for MR dampers in both simulations and experiments. This review provides benefits for further investigation of building damping devices, especially semi-active damping devices that use magnetorheological fluids as working fluids. In particular, this paper provides fundamental material on modeling and control systems used in magnetorheological dampers for buildings. In fact, magnetorheological dampers are no less attractive than other damping devices, such as tuned mass dampers and other viscous dampers. Their reliability is related to the damping control, which could be turned into an interesting discussion for further investigation.

Highlights

  • Earthquakes are responsible for the loss of thousands of lives and billions of dollars in damages to properties

  • The results show that passive tuned mass dampers (TMDs) effectively reduced the response of the building during an earthquake

  • It used fuzzy self-tuning based on neural techniques as well as a control system that was validated using a number of simulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earthquakes are responsible for the loss of thousands of lives and billions of dollars in damages to properties. Structural designs for wind loads use force as a consistent basis as the pressure on the exposed surface area tends to hit a building directly. In structural designs for earthquake loads, building structures are more likely to experience random movements and vibrations from the ground floor This causes an inertial force within the building and results in stress. Over the last few decades, the field of structural engineering has extensively investigated the development of smart structure technologies for structural seismic response controls This is because smart structures are considered to be effective at handling earthquakes. Passive control systems have been extensively studied [62], active and semi-active systems have been investigated as a control for structures [63]

Friction Dampers
Tuned Mass Dampers
Viscous Dampers
Magnetorheological Fluids
Application of MR Dampers in Building Structures
Segmentation of
Model of the three-story building testtest structure
Installation
Modeling of MR Dampers
Simulated
10. Control
Semi-Active
Findings
Future Research
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.