Abstract

Abstract. Secondary ice production (SIP) plays a key role in the formation of ice particles in tropospheric clouds. Future improvement of the accuracy of weather prediction and climate models relies on a proper description of SIP in numerical simulations. For now, laboratory studies remain a primary tool for developing physically based parameterizations for cloud modeling. Over the past 7 decades, six different SIP-identifying mechanisms have emerged: (1) shattering during droplet freezing, (2) the rime-splintering (Hallett–Mossop) process, (3) fragmentation due to ice–ice collision, (4) ice particle fragmentation due to thermal shock, (5) fragmentation of sublimating ice, and (6) activation of ice-nucleating particles in transient supersaturation around freezing drops. This work presents a critical review of the laboratory studies related to secondary ice production. While some of the six mechanisms have received little research attention, for others contradictory results have been obtained by different research groups. Unfortunately, despite vast investigative efforts, the lack of consistency and the gaps in the accumulated knowledge hinder the development of quantitative descriptions of any of the six SIP mechanisms. The present work aims to identify gaps in our knowledge of SIP as well as to stimulate further laboratory studies focused on obtaining a quantitative description of efficiencies for each SIP mechanism.

Highlights

  • Secondary ice production (SIP) is defined here as the formation of atmospheric ice as a result of processes involving preexisting ice particles, in contrast to primary ice production, which commences by the nucleation of ice either homogeneously in strongly supercooled droplets or heterogeneously on the surface of ice-nucleating particles (INPs) (e.g., Kanji et al, 2017)

  • Laboratory studies with reproducible and controlled environments are the basic means of examining physical processes underlying each SIP mechanism, as well as quantifying the rates of secondary ice production, and identifying necessary and sufficient conditions required for initiation of these mechanisms

  • The present paper describes laboratory studies of the following SIP mechanisms: the fragmentation of droplets during their freezing (Sect. 2), rime splintering (Sect. 3), fragmentation due to collision of ice particles with each other (Sect. 4), ice particle fragmentation due to thermal shock caused by freezing droplets on their surface (Sect. 5), fragmentation of sublimating ice particles (Sect. 6), and activation of ice-nucleating particles in transient supersaturation around freezing drops

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Secondary ice production (SIP) is defined here as the formation of atmospheric ice as a result of processes involving preexisting ice particles, in contrast to primary ice production, which commences by the nucleation of ice either homogeneously in strongly supercooled droplets or heterogeneously on the surface of ice-nucleating particles (INPs) (e.g., Kanji et al, 2017). Laboratory studies with reproducible and controlled environments are the basic means of examining physical processes underlying each SIP mechanism, as well as quantifying the rates of secondary ice production, and identifying necessary and sufficient conditions required for initiation of these mechanisms. Without this knowledge, a development of the physically based parameterizations of SIP in weather prediction and climate simulations is not feasible.

Fragmentation of freezing drops
Freezing stages of a supercooled drop
Freezing fraction
Droplet freezing time
Crystalline structure of ice
Pressure inside freezing droplets
Metamorphosis of droplet shape during freezing
Fragmentation during freezing
Summary
Efficiency of rime splintering
Physical mechanism of rime splintering
Fragmentation due to ice–ice collision
Fragmentation due to thermal shock
Fragmentation of sublimating ice particles
Activation of INPs in transient supersaturation around freezing drops
Spurious enhancement of ice concentration during sampling
General comments
Feasibility of SIP mechanisms
Findings
The way forward
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call