Review of data quality assessment frameworks experiences around Europe

Abstract

Abstract In the first phase of its work, WP6 has explored and synthesized existing knowledge and experiences on data quality assurance frameworks (DQAFs) in the context of cross-border sharing of federated secondary use health data. Our aim was to identify good practices within this area and develop a first set of corresponding recommendations. The recommendations reflect the synthesis of results from three parallel lines of work, each utilizing a different methodology: a) thematic workshops and partner meetings, b) analysis of existing data-sharing initiatives, and c) a scoping literature review. Our analysis of literature and existing health data initiatives suggest that currently deployed DQAFs cannot as such serve as platforms or models for an EHDS-wide data quality solution. There is an agreement in principle, that reliability, relevance, timeliness, coherence, coverage and completeness should be incorporated in a DQAF as measurable dimensions of data quality. We aim towards a working definition of data quality, which will be able to reflect the reality of the data, as well as its fitness for purpose from the perspective of potential users. • We recommend focusing efforts on transparency at the level of data holder institutions across Member States in relation to adoption of regular audits, a well-developed DQAF and clear procedures with regard to processing the data. • In the medium to longer-term EHDS nodes could promote and support the development of a benchmarking process, which will assist data managers and data holder institutions with alignment against a Europe-wide approach to measuring data quality within and across Member States.