Abstract
Central venous catheterisation is a core component of intensive care management. Despite advances in medicine, central venous catheters are associated with infection rates ranging between 2.5 and 70% [1,2]. There is, however, little isolated information regarding rates of central line sepsis in neurointensive patients. Microbiology results from the 3 months preceding this study identified six line-related infections. Following implementation of a new evidence-based medicine technique for central lines, this study set out to review central line sepsis in patients at Walton Neurological ITU.
Highlights
There is considerable uncertainty about the reproducibility of the various instruments used to measure dyspnea, their ability to reflect changes in symptoms, whether they accurately reflect the patient’s experience and if its evolution is similar between acute heart failure syndrome patients and nonacute heart failure syndrome patients
We did not find significant differences in the arterial catheterrelated infection (ACRI) incidence per 1,000 arterial catheter days between radial and dorsalis pedis (OR = 1.5; 95% cardiac index (CI) = 0.24 to infinite; P = 0.73); and between radial and brachial access (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.20 to infinite; P = 0.88)
Results of this study show that early tracheostomy, if perioperative complications
Summary
There is considerable uncertainty about the reproducibility of the various instruments used to measure dyspnea, their ability to reflect changes in symptoms, whether they accurately reflect the patient’s experience and if its evolution is similar between acute heart failure syndrome patients and nonacute heart failure syndrome patients. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that critically ill patients may be exposed to a higher FiO2 than that required to maintain adequate oxygenation These results highlight an area of ICU care that has received little study, with no published clinical trials examining the effect of FiO2 on outcome. Results Age, sex, the underlying disease and tumour stage (TNM classification), type of previous anticancer treatment, performance status, severity scores (APACHE II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), ICU and hospital mortalities and hospital outcome at 3, 6 and 12 months were analysed. Clinical data of 277 post-transplantation patients admitted to the ICU were collected at admission and the SAPS 3 and APACHE II score calculated with respective estimated mortality rates.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
