Abstract

Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer and can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Bone modifying agents (BMAs) that include bisphosphonates (BPAs) and denosumab help in decreasing and delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with metastatic breast cancer. BPAs approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in bone metastases (BM) in the United States are pamidronate and zolendronic acid, while clodronate and ibandronate are licensed for use in other countries. Current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every four weeks, or zolendronic acid 4 mg every four weeks or every 12 weeks, or intravenous pamidronate 90 mg every four weeks. Current guidelines do not recommend one BMA over another, however, zolendronic acid and denosumab were the most commonly used BMAs in population-based studies. Side effects of BMAs include acute phase reactions, hypocalcemia, nephrotoxicity, osteonecrosis of jaw, etc. While other side effects are common with both BPAs and denosumab, the latter has less nephrotoxic potential and is preferred for use in patients with renal failure. Current ASCO guidelines recommend continuing BMAs indefinitely, however, in clinical practice, this decision needs to be individualized, especially since there is no data on the impact of long-term use of BMAs. Further studies would need to be developed to develop an algorithm of SRE risk assessment and to determine which patients would benefit from BMAs.

Highlights

  • BackgroundBone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer [1] and can occur in up to 58% of patients with advanced disease [2]

  • We review the current data on the usage of bone modifying agents (BMAs) in metastatic breast cancer

  • Various randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of BMAs in metastatic breast cancer patients and in a recent large metaanalysis, BPAs showed a reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs) by 16%-17% and decreased median time to SREs compared to placebo

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bone is the most common site for distant metastases in breast cancer [1] and can occur in up to 58% of patients with advanced disease [2]. Various RCTs have demonstrated the efficacy of BMAs in metastatic breast cancer patients and in a recent large metaanalysis, BPAs showed a reduction in SREs by 16%-17% and decreased median time to SREs compared to placebo. In head to head comparisons, zoledronic acid was found to be superior to ibandronate in preventing SREs in the ZICE trial [20] In another RCT, zoledronic acid demonstrated higher efficacy in patients with breast carcinoma than pamidronate. In a multiple-event analysis, zoledronic acid significantly lowered the mean skeletal morbidity rate, increased the median time to first SRE, and reduced the risk of developing an SRE by 30% compared to pamidronate [21]. Denosumab was superior to zoledronic acid in reducing the mean skeletal morbidity rate (defined as the ratio of the number of SREs per patient divided by the patient’s time at risk) [26]. Most AEs were low grade and in general, grade 3/4 AEs were rare [18]

Pamidronate
Conclusions
Disclosures
11. Food and Drug Administration
36. Prommer E
Findings
47. Van Poznak C
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call