Abstract
AbstractIndentation size effect, indentation cracks and microhardness measurement of some brittle crystals are reviewed against the background of the existing concepts of indentation deformation of crystalline solids. Several approaches reported in the literature devoted to relationships between applied indentation test loadPand indentation diagonal lengthdare applied to analyze the experimentally observed normal and reverse indentation size effect (ISE) in brittle compounds. Using typical examples of normal and reverse ISE it is shown that the indentation induced cracking model does not give load‐independent hardness and the final expression describing the experimental data for various compounds is essentially another form of the Meyer law. Analysis of experiment data on crack lengths and indentation diagonals for different indentation loads suggests that the origin of ISE is associated with the processes of formation of indentation cracks following the general concepts of fracture mechanics. The load‐independent hardnessH0may be determined reliably from plots ofP/dagainstdof the proportional resistance model or ofHVagainst 1/das predicted by strain gradient plasticity theories. It was found that the load‐independent hardness of depends on crystal orientation and state of the indented surface. Finally, some comments on determination of fracture toughness and brittle index of crystals are made. (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.