Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke are pathologies that often result in the loss of/decrease in hand functionality. Hand function is a critical component of everyday life and therefore, a primary focus of clinical SCI/stroke rehabilitation is hand function recovery/improvement. In recent years, there has been a surge in hand exoskeleton research due to the potential for exoskeletons to improve clinical rehabilitation efficiency through automation. However, there is a disconnect between current clinical practice and exoskeleton research, resulting in a minority of hand exoskeletons being tested on individuals with SCI and/or stroke. This review article provides a comprehensive analysis and review of hand exoskeleton studies based on clinical rehabilitation practices to bridge the knowledge gap between clinical application and laboratory research. The key findings from this paper are: 1) current hand exoskeletons can successfully complete simple ADL tasks but lack the precision for fine motor control, 2) most hand exoskeletons exhibit a low number of degrees-of-freedom compared to the human hand, which may limit movement capability, 3) the majority of hand exoskeletons lack sensing capabilities, restricting viable control methods and user interfaces, and 4) inconsistent evaluation methods across studies do not allow for accurate performance assessment for different exoskeletons. The comparative assessments performed by this survey article show that there remain deficits between clinical hand rehabilitation practices and the current state of hand exoskeletons. By delineating these shortcomings, the information presented in this work can help inform future developments in the field of assistive and rehabilitative hand exoskeletons such that the gap between research and application may be closed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call