Abstract
We are pleased to introduce an addition to the familiar environmental law book review format called the ‘review article’. We would also like to welcome Steven Vaughan’s founding contribution. Vaughan has used the space of an article-length review to compare and contrast two books on a specialist subject area (chemicals regulation). However, it is not so much the number of books under review that defines the format, as the use of a more generous word limit to reflect on specific works of secondary literature in a deeper manner than is often feasible within the constraints of a ‘classic’ book review. Part of the spirit of this innovation is the wish to accommodate the changing character of environmental law scholarship as the discipline matures. One aspect of this is the increasing variety of perspectives that the current literature offers, and the consequential interest in and delicacy of framing the scholarly analysis. There is also—at least for a UK audience—the Research Excellence Framework (REF) to take into account. For fairly obvious reasons, it difficult for a concise book review to satisfy the REF criteria of originality, rigour and significance. However, there are greater possibilities with an article-length review.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.