REVIEW AND OPPONENT`S REVIEW IN THE SYSTEM OF SCIENTIFIC AND LITERARY-CRITICAL GENRES (part 2)

Abstract

The article analyzes the views of contemporary researchers on the essence of the concepts “criticism”, “literary criticism” and “art criticism”. It is noted that these concepts should be considered synonymous, since they all indicate the ability to analyze and evaluate artistic works. The authors of this research offer their own interpretation of the term “literary and artistic criticism”, which is understood as a scientific or professional interpretation of an artistic (literary) work in the context of ideological and aesthetic guidelines of the time, socio-political factors and professional skills of the interpreter. It was determined that in the contemporary literary and critical discourse, a review is understood as one of the most widespread genres in this field, the purpose of which is the analysis and evaluation of an artistic, artistic, journalistic, scientific work in the context of historical, social and political realities, as well as consideration of the corpus violated in the work problems. It was determined that the similarity of literary and critical review and opponent’s review is caused by common structural components, a common goal, the influence of the ideological and aesthetic paradigm of a certain period (the tendency to dominate modification forms in our time) and the desire to respond to the requests of the contemporary audience.