Abstract

Seabed surveying is the basis of engineering development in shallow waters. At present, geophysical survey methods mainly utilize sonars for qualitative surveying, which requires the calibration of the results found through in situ drilling and sampling. Among them, the parameters required for engineering designs are obtained from either in situ tests or laboratory experiments of soil samples retrieved from drilling. However, the experience from onshore applications shows that the physical quantities obtained through quantitative geophysical survey methods for shallow waters can be indirectly used to estimate engineering parameters or directly as parameters for engineering evaluation, which has high application potential. This review analyzes various geophysical survey methods for nearshore site characterization (i.e., side-scan sonar, single/multi- beam sonar, sub-bottom profiler, seismic reflection method, and underwater magnetometer) and challenges in their application, and introduces quantitative geophysical survey methods (including the underwater seismic refraction method, seismic surface wave method and underwater electrical resistivity tomography) that are worth focusing on for future development. Three application difficulties have been identified, namely, the lack of operational efficiency, appropriate operational equipment and systems, and sufficient guidance for experimental shallow sea applications. It is hoped that comprehensive discussion of these challenges will increase awareness leading to engineering improvements in the surveying and measuring capabilities in shallow waters, further reducing the risk of geotechnical hazards.

Highlights

  • With the increasing reliance on the coastal and marine environment, more construction is being carried out, including the development of underwater foundations for existing bridges, sea tunnels or ports, as well as offshore wind farms, floating cities, and tidal stream generators, in an attempt to meet the needs for energy and living environments

  • The results obtained in the second category of geophysical survey methods can identify the interface where the physical quantity changes; these methods include the use of side-scan sonar, single/multi-beam sonar, sub-bottom profiler, seismic reflection method, and ground-penetrating radar

  • Archie [7], Biella et al [8], Klein and Santamarina [9], and others have suggested a highly linear relationship between formation factor and porosity; soil conductivity can be used to estimate hydraulic conductivity ([8,10]). Based on these theoretical findings, an increasing number of cases have recently emerged in which shallow water geophysical methods of the third category have been applied in different engineering surveys: Punzo et al [11] used the imaging profiles obtained from the underwater seismic refraction method to create a 3D model of harbor sediment and estimate its volume for use in further dredging planning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human development moved from the plains into the mountains, yet with the demand for marine resources, this development is currently actively expanding to coastal and offshore areas. Eng. 2022, 10, 344 seabed depth and landforms, it is an important application to determine the geological conditions under the seabed, using reflected waves from sonar signals, which determine material changes qualitatively and assist in evaluating the geologic structure with minimum drilling data. These common shallow water geophysical survey methods mainly provide changes interfacequalitatively information, areinunable to provide its structure engineering material andbut assist evaluating the geologic withproperties. Many quantitative survey techniques can still be applied, such as underwater drilling data These common shallow water geophysical survey methods mainly provide seismic refraction andbut electrical resistivity tomography [1].

Geophysical Survey
Purpose of Engineering Surveying in Nearshore
Applications of Geophysical Survey Methods
Seismic Survey Methods Related to Changes in Physical Quantities
Side-Scan Sonar
Single- and Multi-Beam Sonar
ItSingleand
Illustrations
Sub-Bottom Profiler
Marine Seismic Reflection Method
Underwater
Challenges in the Application of Common Shallow Water Geophysical Methods
Limited Information Acquired below the Seafloor
Inability to Obtain Material Properties of the Seabed
Quantitative Geophysical Methods for Shallow Waters
Underwater Seismic Refraction Method (USRM)
Underwater Seismic Surface Wave Method (USSWM)
Challenges in the Application of Quantitative Geophysical Methods for Nearshore Site
Methods for Nearshoretowing
3: Insufficient guidance for experimental shallow sea applications
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call