Abstract

The outbreak of viruses have necessitated contact tracing and infection tracking methods. Despite various efforts, there is currently no standard scheme for the tracing and tracking. Therefore, many nations of the world have developed their own ways where carriers of disease could be tracked and their contacts traced. These are generalized methods developed either in a distributed manner giving citizens control of their identity or in a centralized manner where a health authority gathers data on those who are carriers. This paper outlines some of the most significant approaches that have been established for contact tracing around the world. A comprehensive review on the key enabling methods used to realize the infrastructure around these infection tracking and contact tracing methods is also presented, and recommendations are made for the most effective way to develop such a practice.

Highlights

  • In December 2019, the Wuhan area of China was the first in the world to experience the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Zhou et al (2020) found that in two hospitals in the area, of those who were discharged and had died, 48% had a co-morbidity with hypertension (30%) and coronary heart disease (8%) being the most common

  • These methods are mainly Bluetooth based where a Bluetooth beacon is sent between Bob and Alice when they are within a given proximity and for a minimum amount of exposure time

  • The European Pan-European Privacy Preserving Proximity Tracing Initiative (PEPP-PT) proposes an open source Bluetooth-based platform sharing software, standards, and services that can be utilized for the development of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In December 2019, the Wuhan area of China was the first in the world to experience the spread of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Zhou et al (2020) found that in two hospitals in the area, of those who were discharged and had died, 48% had a co-morbidity with hypertension (30%) and coronary heart disease (8%) being the most common. Germany was able to hold off the disease for a few weeks by using manual contact tracing and moving COVID-19-positive patients to quarantine 2020, but the effectiveness of contact tracing relies on the faster growth of identified cases than the number of new infections (Eames and Keeling, 2003), which is not possible in manual tracing. This limitation is stressed out by the exponential spread of the disease enabled by a higher-population density and frequent movement of urban residents.

UNDERLYING TECHNOLOGY
CONTACT TRACING APPS FOR COVID-19
Apple and Google
The United Kingdom
The European Union
Russia
France
Poland
Germany
3.10. South Korea
3.11. Singapore
3.13. The United States
3.15. Israel
3.16. Australia
3.18. TraceSecure
3.19. Cryptographic Preservation of Privacy
KEY ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES
Mobile Network Tracing
Crowd Sourcing of Social Media
Wearable Devices
Attacks on Data Privacy
ATTACKS
Attacks on Model Privacy
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Who Is Trent?
Where Is Carol?
What Is Carol’s Attestation?
Clear Role for Trent
Trent Must Be the Health Authority
There Is No Real Integration of Identities
There Is No Clear Mechanism for Alice’s Consent
Long-Term Data Retention
Lack of Incentive for Uptake
6.10. Poor Data Quality
6.11. No Binding of Data
6.12. There’s No Signing Involved
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.