Abstract

Review 2 of "Policing Perspectives Concerning Confusion and Uncertainty in Policing Practices with 'Honour'-Based Crimes and Forced Marriages"

Highlights

  • [For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did

  • P.3 - Consider whether research question 2 and 3 should be swapped in order

  • P.11 –I fully concur with your comments about the ‘honour’ discourse being problematic, divisive and consonant with political agenda around race, immigration, Othering etc

Read more

Summary

Introduction

[For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did. please explain your vote. [For votes to count, referees must reasonably explain why they voted as they did. If you voted to publish pending minor changes, specify each change, why it is needed, and, possibly, how it should/could be done.] P.3 - Consider whether research question 2 and 3 should be swapped in order.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.