Abstract

The extinction of conditioned fear is labile. For example, fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus (CS) returns after presentation of an aversive stimulus (“reinstatement”) or a change in context (“renewal”). Substantial research implicates the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in the stress-induced relapse of extinguished behaviors, such as in instrumental drug seeking, but its role in the relapse of extinguished fear responses is not clear. Here, we explored the role of the BNST in both the reinstatement and renewal of fear, two forms of relapse that are differentially triggered by stress. In Experiment 1, rats received pairings of an auditory CS and footshock unconditioned stimulus (US) followed by an extinction procedure. After extinction, rats received an unsignaled US to reinstate fear to the extinguished CS. Twenty-four hours later, they were infused with either muscimol or vehicle into the BNST immediately prior to a CS retrieval test. In Experiment 2, rats were conditioned and extinguished in two distinct contexts. Twenty-four hours after extinction, the rats were infused with muscimol, NBQX, or vehicle immediately prior to a CS retrieval test in either the extinction context or a different (but familiar) context. In both experiments, freezing behavior served as the index of conditioned fear. The results revealed that BNST inactivation prevented reinstatement (Experiment 1), but not renewal (Experiment 2), of conditioned freezing to the extinguished CS. Hence, the BNST is critical for the reinstatement of extinguished fear in an aversive context, but not for the contextual retrieval processes that mediate fear renewal.

Highlights

  • Fear relapse plagues clinical interventions for fearrelated anxiety disorders (Hooley, 2007; Boschen et al., 2009; Vervliet et al, 2013b)

  • The current study reveals the novel finding that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) plays a specific role in the shock-induced reinstatement of extinguished fear; BNST inactivation did not affect the renewal of extinguished fear that accompanies a change in context

  • This pattern of results is consistent with other reports indicating that the BNST has a selective role in the expression of fear to contextual compared to discrete conditioned stimulus (CS) (LeDoux et al, 1988; Walker and Davis, 1997; Sullivan et al, 2004; Waddell et al, 2006, 2008; Zimmerman and Maren, 2011; Sink et al, 2013; see Duvarci et al, 2009; Haufler et al, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fear relapse plagues clinical interventions for fearrelated anxiety disorders (Hooley, 2007; Boschen et al., 2009; Vervliet et al, 2013b). Pavlovian fear conditioning and extinction in rodents provides a clinically relevant model to explore the behavioral and brain mechanisms of relapse. Fear conditioning in rats is a behavioral procedure through which subjects experience concomitant pairings of a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS), such as a tone, with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US), such as a footshock (Rescorla, 1988a,b). Presentation of the CS alone comes to elicit conditioned fear responses (CRs), including freezing behavior (Fendt and Fanselow, 1999; LeDoux, 2000; Maren, 2001). Fear CRs occur in the place or “context” in which fear conditioning was experienced (Bouton and King, 1983; Maren et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call