REVERSED SCHEDULE EFFECTS IN CLOSED AND OPEN ECONOMIES

Abstract

Pigeons received food according to either fixed‐interval, fixed‐ratio, or random‐interval schedules in both closed and open feeding economies. In the closed economy, they were not food deprived, they controlled the amount of food received at each meal, and they had no other source of food. In the open economy, each feeding bout consisted of one feeder cycle, and the pigeons received supplemental feeding as needed to maintain them at 80% of their free‐feeding weights. Response rate always increased with larger schedule requirements in the closed economy, but it either decreased steadily or increased and then decreased in the open economy. Initial pauses lengthened with longer fixed intervals or fixed ratios (FR) in the open economy but less so in the closed economy. Responding continued under FR 10,000 schedules in the closed economy, but never survived FR 400 in the open economy. In the open economy, fixed‐interval schedules could maintain far more behavior than could either fixed ratios or random intervals. Familiar concepts such as matching and arousal can describe at least some of the behavior in the open economy, but current theory does not apply well to behavior in the closed economy. An explanation of economy‐dependent effects might begin with the possibility that the two economies invoke different evolved survival strategies. These strategies influence behavior by means of different mechanisms and laws. The strategy for the closed economy may relate to weight conservation, but that for the open economy may be based on energy conservation.