Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been reported to have success in treating massive rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral arthritis. However, some patients have been observed to have unexpectedly poor functional improvements after this operation. Since alternative treatment options exist for the rotator cuff deficient shoulder, our aim is to identify risk factors for poor functional improvement after reverse arthroplasty in order to guide patient selection. Furthermore, we sought to assess the overall value of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in cases with poor functional improvement versus controls.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
