Abstract

Inverse manufacturing is always the best substitute for collection centers any method for recovering products should take this into account strategically. These results are typically described as being multidimensional, transdisciplinary, complex, and unstructured. Installation of reverse logistics systems properly, due to reuse or reproduction of certain parts not surprisingly, as a result, operations expenses are reduced and consumer loyalty is improved. To explore the practices of reverse logistics in this industry with a follow-up interview conducted to present the results of a survey this is the main objective of this paper. The purpose of this study is to identify the best inventory policies for a reverse logistics system with a specialized system. Demand over a given planning horizon is assumed to be a known continuous function and the rate of return on goods consumed is a given function. MCDM decision-making method provides an alternative framework for handling these. Determining decision-making strategies for reverse logistics system (RLS) problems and a great alternative choice for reprocessing. To design a decision-making model for that, considering issues including cost/time, legal considerations, influence on the environment, quality, and market a quantitative and qualitative assessment is required. Based on these criteria Performance must be considered to determine the appropriate reversal position. The manufacturing option is subject to the judgement of subject-matter authorities. The WSM approach is based on theory in this publication. A multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) model is what we suggest. The suggested model aids in creating adaptable revenue plans that are effective and efficient based on numerous criteria. Businesses also conduct this analysis. To build new reprocessing facilities or to utilise the facility more effectively is a tool for making strategic decisions. In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is suggested based on WSM method set theory. Alternatives include remanufacturing, reselling, repairing, cannibalising, and refurbishing; evaluation criteria include market factor (C1), quality factor (C2), legislative impact (C3), environmental impact (C4), and cost/time factor (C4). As a result the Remanufacturing is in 1st rank and Refurbishing ailast rank. Also, based on the WSM method Flexible MCDM and inverse logistics for alternative tests This paper also attempts to come up with a well-suited team decision support tool.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call