Abstract

Osseointegration is the basis of successful dental implantology and the foundation of cementless arthroplasty and the osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system. Osseointegration has been considered irreversible thus far. However, controlled heating or cooling of dental implants could selectively damage the bone at the bone–implant interface, causing the reversal of osseointegration or “osseodisintegration”. This review compares five methods for implant removal, published as patent documents between 2010 and 2018, which have not yet been discussed in the scientific literature. We describe these methods and evaluate their potential for reversing osseointegration. The five methods have several technical and methodological similarities: all methods include a handpiece, a connecting device for coronal access, and a controlling device, as well as the application of mechanical and/or thermal energy. The proposed method of quantifying the temperature with a sensor as the sole means for regulating the process seems inadequate. A database used in one of the methods, however, allows a more precise correlation between a selected implant and the energy needed for its removal, thus avoiding unnecessary trauma to the patient. A flapless, microinvasive, and bone-conserving approach for removing failed dental implants, facilitating successful reimplantation, would benefit dental implantology. These methods could be adapted to cementless medical implants and osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetics. However, for some of the methods discussed herein, further research may be necessary.

Highlights

  • Peri-implantitis and malpositioning are relevant from an aesthetic perspective, which is integral to dental implant treatment [2]

  • This review focuses on five methods disclosed in the patent literature for the removal of failed dental implants that can be found in the Patentscope database of the World

  • The authors of these patents noted the disadvantages of the conventional techniques for implant removal and critically commented on the bone loss associated with resective implant removal using burs [32,48,49,50]

Read more

Summary

Patented Methods

Rolf G. Winnen 1, * , Kristian Kniha 2 , Ali Modabber 2 , Faruk Al-Sibai 3, *, Andreas Braun 4 , Reinhold Kneer 3 and Frank Hölzle 2 Citation: Winnen, R.G.; Kniha, K.; Modabber, A.; Al-Sibai, F.; Braun, A.; Kneer, R.; Hölzle, F. Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel

Introduction
Principles
Energy Application
Connection
Process Control
Challenges Related to Temperature-Focused Approaches
Challenges Related to the Mechanical Approach
Summary
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.