Abstract

We consider the problem of revenue sharing contracts between Content Providers (CPs) to a common Internet Service Provider (ISP). Under the contract, the ISP makes investment decisions to improve network infrastructure that in turn improves the quality of service for the end-users. Such contracts are studied under the neutral and non-neutral regime where it is observed that the neutral regime yields lower social utility though it is preferred from the point of view of making the Internet a level platform for CPs of all 'size.' In this work, we propose a soft-neutral regime for revenue sharing in the Moral Hazard framework that alleviates the loss in social utility in the neutral regime. The 'softness' of the regime is parametrized by a single variable and spans the neutral and the non-neutral regime as we vary it between two extremes. We evaluate the social utility in the soft neutral regime and show its improvements over the neutral regime.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call