Abstract

This research investigated one of the foundational notions of religion, i.e., revelation, as presented by Muhammad Abduh (d. 1905) in Risālatal-Tawḥīd and Risālatal-Wāridāt, through a comparison with the understanding of revelation in the Catholic tradition, as elucidated by Pope Ratzinger (b. 1927), and in Judaism, as presented by the Jewish scholar B. D. Spinoza (d. 1677). This research closely considered Abduh’s works to reveal whether the notion of revelation in the Islamic tradition is different from or analogous to its counterparts in Catholicism and Judaism. Although these authors’ religious backgrounds are diverse, their understandings of revelation are analogous in the sense that revelation is understood as beyond the linguistic realm. However, they each have different religious and intellectual stances regarding the valid interpretation and knowledge of revelation; where Ratzinger relies on the Church’s authority, Spinoza believes in the efficacy of holy scripture, and Abduh has more confidence in the use of reason in understanding revelation. By delineating the commonalities and differences of the ideas of these three scholars from different religious backgrounds, a more open and fruitful interreligious conversation can be further cultivated.

Highlights

  • Despite the different backgrounds of Abduh, Ratzinger, and Spinoza, their thoughts on revelation are identical in terms of perceiving revelation in the sense of a spiritual dimension

  • It might be true that Muhammad Abduh frequently criticized Christianity for its adherence towards the Church and disregarding the role of reason in faith

  • After considering the notion of revelation proposed by Ratzinger, it appears that Abduh’s idea of revelation is homologous to the pneuma of the Christian scripture and phenomena exceeding the limits of knowledge in Spinoza’s explanation

Read more

Summary

What Is Revelation?

They can justify the reality of revelation through what Spinoza called “a sheer faith” , especially the faith of the truth of what is revealed by God to the prophets According to this philosopher, believing in the truth of revelation is important because knowledge of all the things in Scripture must be only sought from Scripture itself, just as the knowledge of nature must be sought from nature itself.. Spinoza’s notion of revelation and its justification is closer to the idea of Abduh than that of Ratzinger Both conceive of revelation as a certain kind of knowledge and see the importance of human intelligence in the forms of either reason or imagination.

How Is the Right Interpretation of Revelation Possible?
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call