Abstract

BackgroundReproductive traits such as number of stillborn piglets (SB) and number of teats (NT) have been evaluated in many genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most of these GWAS were performed under the assumption that these traits were normally distributed. However, both SB and NT are discrete (e.g. count) variables. Therefore, it is necessary to test for better fit of other appropriate statistical models based on discrete distributions. In addition, although many GWAS have been performed, the biological meaning of the identified candidate genes, as well as their functional relationships still need to be better understood. Here, we performed and tested a Bayesian treatment of a GWAS model assuming a Poisson distribution for SB and NT in a commercial pig line. To explore the biological role of the genes that underlie SB and NT and identify the most likely candidate genes, we used the most significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to collect related genes and generated gene-transcription factor (TF) networks.ResultsComparisons of the Poisson and Gaussian distributions showed that the Poisson model was appropriate for SB, while the Gaussian was appropriate for NT. The fitted GWAS models indicated 18 and 65 significant SNPs with one and nine quantitative trait locus (QTL) regions within which 18 and 57 related genes were identified for SB and NT, respectively. Based on the related TF, we selected the most representative TF for each trait and constructed a gene-TF network of gene-gene interactions and identified new candidate genes.ConclusionsOur comparative analyses showed that the Poisson model presented the best fit for SB. Thus, to increase the accuracy of GWAS, counting models should be considered for this kind of trait. We identified multiple candidate genes (e.g. PTP4A2, NPHP1, and CYP24A1 for SB and YLPM1, SYNDIG1L, TGFB3, and VRTN for NT) and TF (e.g. NF-κB and KLF4 for SB and SOX9 and ELF5 for NT), which were consistent with known newborn survival traits (e.g. congenital heart disease in fetuses and kidney diseases and diabetes in the mother) and mammary gland biology (e.g. mammary gland development and body length).Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-016-0189-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Reproductive traits such as number of stillborn piglets (SB) and number of teats (NT) have been evaluated in many genome-wide association studies (GWAS)

  • According to Spiegelhalter et al [40], models with differences in deviance information criterion (DIC) less than 2 must be considered, while models that have DIC that are between 2 and 7 have considerably less support. By using these differences in DIC as a reference, the Poisson model was clearly superior for SB and the Gaussian was clearly superior for NT

  • We showed that the Poisson distribution best fitted the data for number of SB, whereas the Gaussian distribution was superior for NT in pig

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reproductive traits such as number of stillborn piglets (SB) and number of teats (NT) have been evaluated in many genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To explore the biological role of the genes that underlie SB and NT and identify the most likely candidate genes, we used the most significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to collect related genes and generated gene-transcription factor (TF) networks Reproductive traits, such as number of stillborn piglets (SB) and number of teats (NT), are widely included in the selection indices of pig breeding programs due to their importance to the pig industry. Number of vertebrae, which determines the body length of the sow, may have a direct relation with the final NT that is observed in pigs [8] Since these traits are directly involved with higher production and welfare of piglets, several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed for SB and NT [2, 9, 10]. The Poisson distribution has already been implemented in animal breeding in the context of traditional mixed models [11, 12] and quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping [13, 14], there are no reports of GWAS for SB and NT using such models

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.