Abstract
This article conducts revealed preference tests of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem. If the Stolper?Samuelson theorem holds, one would expect to find a country's relatively scarce factor of production (in this case labor) harmed from trade liberalization and thus opposing trade liberalization. The reverse would be true for its relatively abundant factor of production (in this case capital). Therefore, this article examines representations made before the Canadian House of Commons committee studying the Canadian?U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Assuming representations coincide with the self-interest of the presenters, the effects of trade liberalization on factor returns are inferred. It finds strong support for the proposition that labor behaves as the Stolper?Samuelson theorem would predict and qualified support for capital behaving as the Stolper?Samuelson theorem would predict.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.