Abstract
We propose a model of deliberate preference change that is identifiable, empirically testable, and founded on two normative principles. First, the decision maker (DM) must be able to justify her preference change by making attributes of the alternatives relevant or irrelevant to her choices. Second, DM's successive preference changes must result from consistent deliberations about which attributes to make relevant or irrelevant for her future choices. We show that these two principles are necessary and sufficient to rationalize preference changes by the maximization of a meta-preference. Finally, we illustrate how our model can generate the polarization of political preferences among ex-ante identical voters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.