Abstract

Background. Indication for immediate revascularization during acute myocardial infarction (MI) is debated. Drug-resistant crescendo angina, as well as hemodynamic compromise, however, often requires acute operation. In this study the differential risks of acute coronary artery bypass grafting with and without MI were stratified. Methods. Five hundred eighteen patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were investigated. Thirty-nine patients underwent acute revascularization because of enzyme-proven or electrocardiogram-proven MI accompanied by crescendo angina, hemodynamic compromise, or both. They were compared with 33 emergent, 63 urgent, and 383 elective patients without MI. Preoperative risk factors for early mortality and necessity of continuous venovenous hemofiltration were analyzed by means of logistical regression analysis. Perioperative data were compared. Results. Early mortality of the MI cohort was 15.4%, in contrast to 15.2% in emergent, none in urgent, and 2.1% in elective patients. Left internal thoracic artery was used in 87% of MI, 97% of emergent, 94% of urgent, and 97% of elective patients. Intraaortic balloon pump was necessary in 50% of MI patients, 27% of emergent, 6.3% of urgent, and 3.1% of elective cases. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration was performed in 29% of MI patients, 15% of emergent, 4.9% of urgent, and 3.4% of elective patients. Hemodynamic instability significantly increased the odds ratio for early mortality and continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Conclusions. Patients undergoing acute revascularization carried an elevated risk to die early notwithstanding the presence or absence of acute MI. Liberal use of left internal thoracic artery grafts was not detrimental in acute patients whereas liberal use of intraaortic balloon pump was beneficial. In almost 30% of MI patients, continuous venovenous hemofiltration was not necessary, implying a severely impaired perioperative hemodynamic condition. Immediate revascularization in the presence of acute MI is therefore indicated although it may be addressed as a separate high-risk group.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.