Abstract

BackgroundThis paper examines the ethical aspects of organ transplant surgery in which a donor heart is transplanted from a first recipient, following determination of death by neurologic criteria, to a second recipient. Retransplantation in this sense differs from that in which one recipient undergoes repeat heart transplantation of a newly donated organ, and is thus referred to here as “reuse cardiac organ transplantation.”MethodsMedical, legal, and ethical analysis, with a main focus on ethical analysis.ResultsFrom the medical perspective, it is critical to ensure the quality and safety of reused organs, but we lack sufficient empirical data pertaining to medical risk. From the legal perspective, a comparative examination of laws in the United States and Japan affirms no illegality, but legal scholars disagree on the appropriate analysis of the issues, including whether or not property rights apply to transplanted organs. Ethical arguments supporting the reuse of organs include the analogous nature of donation to gifts, the value of donations as inheritance property, and the public property theory as it pertains to organs. Meanwhile, ethical arguments such as those that address organ recycling and identity issues challenge organ reuse.ConclusionWe conclude that organ reuse is not only ethically permissible, but even ethically desirable. Furthermore, we suggest changes to be implemented in the informed consent process prior to organ transplantation. The organ transplant community worldwide should engage in wider and deeper discussions, in hopes that such efforts will lead to the timely preparation of guidelines to implement reuse cardiac organ transplantation as well as reuse transplantation of other organs such as kidney and liver.

Highlights

  • This paper examines the ethical aspects of organ transplant surgery in which a donor heart is transplanted from a first recipient, following determination of death by neurologic criteria, to a second recipient

  • We believe that an ethical analysis of cardiac organ transplantation should create the general framework for all other models of reuse organ transplantation, because cardiac transplantation is impossible for living donors

  • Even if priority is given to first recipient (FR)/second donor (SD)’s intention, we can argue that reuse cardiac organ transplantation (RCOT) is ethically permissible, or that RCOT is ethically impermissible, both in light of discussions relating to the transfer of ownership rights

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper examines the ethical aspects of organ transplant surgery in which a donor heart is transplanted from a first recipient, following determination of death by neurologic criteria, to a second recipient. Retransplantation in this sense differs from that in which one recipient undergoes repeat heart transplantation of a newly donated organ, and is referred to here as “reuse cardiac organ transplantation.”. Transplantation of a donated heart from a first recipient (FR) to a Nakazawa et al BMC Medical Ethics (2018) 19:77 organ transplantation. The question is: what is the moral status of an organ transplanted into a recipient’s body? This paper presents a hypothetical case and discusses the medical, legal, and ethical issues therein

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.