Abstract

The handling of fresh fruits and vegetables in reusable plastic crates (RPCs) has the potential to increase the sustainability of packaging in the fresh produce supply chain. However, the utilization of multiple-use containers can have consequences related to the microbial safety of this type of food. The present study assessed the potential cross-contamination of fresh cauliflowers with Salmonella enterica via different contact materials (polypropylene from RPCs, corrugated cardboard, and medium-density fiberboard (MDF) from wooden boxes). Additionally, the survival of the pathogenic microorganism was studied in cauliflowers and the contact materials during storage. The life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to evaluate the environmental impact of produce handling containers made from the different food-contact materials tested. The results show a higher risk of cross-contamination via polypropylene compared with cardboard and MDF. Another outcome of the study is the potential of Salmonella for surviving both in cross-contaminated produce and in contact materials under supply chain conditions. Regarding environmental sustainability, RPCs have a lower environmental impact than single-use containers (cardboard and wooden boxes). To exploit the potential environmental benefits of RPCs while ensuring food safety, it is necessary to guarantee the hygiene of this type of container.

Highlights

  • Reusable plastic crates (RPCs) are utilized in different steps of the fruit and vegetable supply chain, including harvest, handling, packaging, and transport operations, as well as in the retail sector [1]

  • Different studies have suggested that there is a higher transfer of microorganisms to fresh produce from plastic containers in comparison with containers made of other materials

  • A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to evaluate the sustainability of packaging containers made of the different materials studied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reusable plastic crates (RPCs) are utilized in different steps of the fruit and vegetable supply chain, including harvest, handling, packaging, and transport operations, as well as in the retail sector [1]. The contamination of fresh produce can come from several sources, including food-contact surfaces where pathogenic microorganisms can survive and be transferred to food [5]. Different studies have suggested that there is a higher transfer of microorganisms to fresh produce from plastic containers in comparison with containers made of other materials. Apart from the higher entrapping capability of wood and cardboard compared with plastic, the authors suggested the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms on plastic surfaces as a potential cause for the differences with the other materials. The materials tested were: polypropylene from RPCs, corrugated cardboard, and medium-density fiberboard (MDF) from wooden boxes These materials are commonly used in the manufacturing of fresh-produce handling containers. A life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used to evaluate the sustainability of packaging containers made of the different materials studied

Via Polypropylene
Effect of the Inoculum Size
Via Cardboard and MDF
Statistical Analysis
Environmental Impact of Different Types of Fresh Produce Handling Containers
Goal and Scope
Life Cycle Inventory
Impact Assessment
Effect of the Salmonella Inoculum Size
Findings
4.4.Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call