Abstract
The hypothesis of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) colonisation by Amerindian voyagers has been largely dismissed archaeologically since the mid-twentieth-century controversy generated by Thor Heyerdahl’s American Indians in the Pacific. The orthodox hypothesis today is that Rapa Nui was settled exclusively by Polynesians who, however, brought the sweet potato and a few other items from South America by return voyaging. This view is challenged by recent evidence that widespread admixture of Amerindian and East Polynesian DNA in East Polynesia, dated to the twelfth to fourteenth century AD, could represent Amerindian landfalls. Reconsideration, here, of putative Amerindian archaeological remains on Rapa Nui—notably the façade of the ceremonial platform known as Ahu Tahiri, circular stone structures known as tupa, and birdman motifs—in the light of recent, largely contextual, research also appears to offer more support for the hypothesis than hitherto. However, the argument is heavily constrained by the long absence of systematic analytical research designed to test such indications, perhaps because marginalising the Amerindian hypothesis suits archaeological perspectives on both sides of the southeast Pacific. The purpose of this review is to encourage new research on the archaeological material in question.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.