Return to Work after Surgical Clipping versus Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Nationwide Registry–Based Study

Abstract

PurposeTo assess return to work following the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Materials and MethodsThis retrospective, nationwide registry–based study included all adult patients of working age treated for a UIA in Norway between 2008 and 2018 who had a record of sickness leave on the day of treatment. Data from The Norwegian Patient Registry and The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration were linked on an individual level. Daily sickness and recipiency of disability benefits, as an indirect measure of working status, from 1 year before treatment to 1 year after treatment were analyzed. Return to work after endovascular treatment and surgical clipping was compared. ResultsIn total, 412 patients were included. Of patients who worked 1 year before treatment, 83% returned to work 1 year after treatment. The number of days from treatment to the first day back at work in a continuous 3-month working period was lower in patients who underwent endovascular treatment than in those treated with surgical clipping (median, 69 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 51–87; vs 201 days, 95% CI, 163–239; P < .001). Return to work was more likely in patients who underwent endovascular treatment at 3 months after treatment (hazard ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.54–4.93; P < .001). There was no difference in return to work at 6 and 12 months after treatment. ConclusionsThe treatment of UIAs affects patients’ postoperative working status. Patients treated endovascularly return to work earlier than those who undergo open surgery.