RETURN TO SPORT FOLLOWING CLOSED ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF ELIGIBLE STUDIES EVALUATING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, PATIENT FACTORS, AND LEVEL OF ATHLETIC ACTIVITY

Abstract

IntroductionAchilles Tendon Rupture (ATR) is a prevalent injury in Western society. Much of the recent research has focused on measuring surgical methods and strength regained, rather than practical measures such as Return to Sport (RTS). A large systematic review was published in 2016 setting a benchmark RTS as 80%. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an up-to-date RTS following ATR.MethodsPubMed and SPORTdiscuss databases were used to search for eligible studies published since 2017 that focused on closed Achilles tendon ruptures with clear definitions of return to sport and a minimum length of follow-up. The Newcastle-Ottawa grading tool was used to assess risk of bias in all included studies.ResultsOf 15 articles identified, 9 were ‘good’ and 6 were ‘fair’ after bias assessment, with none excluded for being poor. Return-to-sport (RTS) rate following Achilles tendon rupture was 76.76% (95% CI 74.19, 79.34 P= <0.001). Non-professional athletes had a higher RTS rate (78.29%; 95% CI 74.89, 81.68 P= <0.001) than professional athletes (74.91%; 95% CI 70.98, 78.85 P= <0.001). Surgical intervention resulted in a lower RTS rate (74.17%; 95% CI 70.74, 77.60 P= <0.001) than conservative management (70.00%; 95% CI 60.48, 79.52 P= <0.001).ConclusionThese findings highlight the need to identify factors affecting RTS rates, including the type of management, level of sport, and patient-specific factors. Clinicians can use these findings to guide informed shared decision-making with patients regarding the long-term implications of ATR and to develop more targeted rehabilitation strategies for this injury.