Abstract

Return rates of 4,178 female and 1,565 male breeding Pied Flycatchers ringed in 1965–2017 were studied near the species’ upper elevation and climatic limit in northern Sweden. Female return rate was 7.5% in the season subsequent to the first breeding season. Having returned once, 37% continued to return the next three seasons. Corresponding return rates of males were 27% and 39%. Female return rate decreased with more than 30% during the study period whereas that of males did not decrease. This difference was probably due to increased mortality during the non-breeding season that selectively struck females after the 1970s. Local factors affected return rates in both sexes. Return rate was positively correlated with breeding success in females but negatively in males, whereas it was correlated with nest-predation in the opposite way. Predation by mustelids accounted for a significant part of female return rate. Females that had returned once were continuously faithful to the former breeding site. Males showed faithfulness only after having returned twice.

Highlights

  • Female return rate decreased with more than 30 % during the study period whereas that of males did not decrease. This difference was probably due to increased mortality during the non-breeding season that selectively struck females after the 1970s

  • Predation by mustelids accounted for a significant part of female return rate

  • The Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca has relatively ringed adults are considered as being of unknown age recently expanded its distribution range northwards (2CY+) and recruited from elsewhere

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca has relatively ringed adults are considered as being of unknown age recently expanded its distribution range northwards (2CY+) and recruited from elsewhere. The weighted mean rates of females and males ringed in 1965–1983 that returned in Years X + 2 to X + 4 were similar, 41 % and 39 %, respectively (Table 6). The other factors, breeding success and nest abandonment, had non-significant influence on the variation of female return rate.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.