Abstract

I have a vivid recollection of my first visit to a “real” museum – the Royal Ontario Museum – when I was somewhere around ten years old. I was awestruck at the sight of glass-cased stuffed leopards, open-casketed mummies, massive Asian stone carvings and towering dinosaur skeletons in (to my eyes) cavernous halls. Well, of course. It was my first experience of the sublime. Three impressions stand out now, however, with the passage of time and the changes we have all seen in museum culture. The first is that, as I remember, we touched the bones of the dinosaur, clambered over the Asian stone statuary, roamed freely among and between the exhibits in what seems now either curatorial sacrilege or the roots of “please touch” exhibits. I may misremember, but I have it in my head that a large part of my wonder was predicated on being able to use my sense of touch in a profligate manner throughout the museum. I recollect, as well, being overwhelmed by the number of objects on display, in a disordered chaos of materiality – a Noah’s ark of artefacts. No doubt there was a structure, room by room, and there were descriptive labels; but my child’s-eye view received it otherwise. There was, finally, a deep sense of wonder at the age of things – and a knowledge that these “things” were indeed “old,” reinforced and given credence by the fact that they were covered with a layer of dust. They must have been of great age (I thought) because they had been in this ancient building for so long, unmoved and unchanging. I had, then, at the age of ten, in every respect confused the setting with the artefact. This is evidence of my own naivete, though I suspect the error is entirely normal.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call