Abstract

Strategies employed by wide-ranging foraging animals involve consideration of habitat quality and predictability and should maximise net energy gain. Fidelity to foraging sites is common in areas of high resource availability or where predictable changes in resource availability occur. However, if resource availability is heterogeneous or unpredictable, as it often is in marine environments, then habitat familiarity may also present ecological benefits to individuals. We examined the winter foraging distribution of female Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazelle, over four years to assess the degree of foraging site fidelity at two scales; within and between years. On average, between-year fidelity was strong, with most individuals utilising more than half of their annual foraging home range over multiple years. However, fidelity was a bimodal strategy among individuals, with five out of eight animals recording between-year overlap values of greater than 50%, while three animals recorded values of less than 5%. High long-term variance in sea surface temperature, a potential proxy for elevated long-term productivity and prey availability, typified areas of overlap. Within-year foraging site fidelity was weak, indicating that successive trips over the winter target different geographic areas. We suggest that over a season, changes in prey availability are predictable enough for individuals to shift foraging area in response, with limited associated energetic costs. Conversely, over multiple years, the availability of prey resources is less spatially and temporally predictable, increasing the potential costs of shifting foraging area and favouring long-term site fidelity. In a dynamic and patchy environment, multi-year foraging site fidelity may confer a long-term energetic advantage to the individual. Such behaviours that operate at the individual level have evolutionary and ecological implications and are potential drivers of niche specialization and modifiers of intra-specific competition.

Highlights

  • Foraging animals are expected to make prudent choices in order to minimise energy expenditure whilst maximising energy intake

  • Multi-year tracks were available for eight individuals, all from Marion Island (N = 46 trips) and tracks of repeat trips within a year were available for 55 individuals (N = 124 trips), totalling 211 individual foraging trips and 33 716 location estimates, of which 15 295 (45%) were identified as likely area restricted search (ARS) behaviour (Fig. 1)

  • Most studies of foraging behaviour seek to identify aspects of foraging strategies, such as habitat preference or prey searching techniques, with little consideration of whether particular strategies are consistent over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foraging animals are expected to make prudent choices in order to minimise energy expenditure whilst maximising energy intake. Individuals from a range of taxa including mammals [6, 7], birds [8, 9], fish [10] and insects [11] repeatedly return to foraging sites. We may consider such behaviour a form of optimal foraging [12], where the act of remaining faithful to a site delivers an increase in net energy intake, in environments with high resource availability

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call