Retroverting Periacetabular Osteotomy for Symptomatic Acetabular Anteversion

Abstract

BackgroundAcetabular dysplasia has traditionally been defined using the lateral center edge angle and treated with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). However, the recently described Ottawa classification further quantifies dysplasia in 3-dimensional terms, categorizing Ottawa A as dysplasia due to isolated, excessive acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular under-coverage. We sought to determine if patients who have Ottawa A dysplasia can expect similar outcomes when undergoing a PAO compared to a traditional dysplasia cohort. MethodsPatients who had undergone PAO with Ottawa A hip dysplasia were selected and compared to a control group of patients who had lateral acetabular undercoverage. The modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool–33 were collected preoperatively and at various follow-up points for a final follow-up average of 2.3 years (range, 0.9 to 6.2). ResultsThe 17 patients (21 hips) who had Ottawa A dysplasia were compared to a control cohort of 69 patients (88 hips). Both groups saw significant improvements in modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool–33 at final follow-up, P < .001. There were no differences between groups in any of the outcome measures or rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or substantial clinical benefit. Rates of MCID ranged from 82.4 to 100%, and rates of achieving substantial clinical benefit ranged from 47.1 to 52.9%. ConclusionsIn patients undergoing a PAO for Ottawa A hip dysplasia, a significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes can be expected with high rates of MCID achievement. This is not significantly different for patients undergoing PAO for more traditional dysplasia parameters.