Retrospective record review in proactive patient safety work – identification of no-harm incidents

Kristina Schildmeijer,Maria Unbeck,Olav Muren,Joep Perk,Lena Nilsson,Karin Pukk Härenstam

doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-282

Abstract

BackgroundIn contrast to other safety critical industries, well-developed systems to monitor safety within the healthcare system remain limited. Retrospective record review is one way of identifying adverse events in healthcare. In proactive patient safety work, retrospective record review could be used to identify, analyze and gain information and knowledge about no-harm incidents and deficiencies in healthcare processes. The aim of the study was to evaluate retrospective record review for the detection and characterization of no-harm incidents, and compare findings with conventional incident-reporting systems.MethodsA two-stage structured retrospective record review of no-harm incidents was performed on a random sample of 350 admissions at a Swedish orthopedic department. Results were compared with those found in one local, and four national incident-reporting systems.ResultsWe identified 118 no-harm incidents in 91 (26.0%) of the 350 records by retrospective record review. Ninety-four (79.7%) no-harm incidents were classified as preventable. The five incident-reporting systems identified 16 no-harm incidents, of which ten were also found by retrospective record review. The most common no-harm incidents were related to drug therapy (n = 66), of which 87.9% were regarded as preventable.ConclusionsNo-harm incidents are common and often preventable. Retrospective record review seems to be a valuable tool for identifying and characterizing no-harm incidents. Both harm and no-harm incidents can be identified in parallel during the same record review. By adding a retrospective record review of randomly selected records to conventional incident-reporting, health care providers can gain a clearer and broader picture of commonly occurring, no-harm incidents in order to improve patient safety.

Highlights

In contrast to other safety critical industries, well-developed systems to monitor safety within the healthcare system remain limited
The study emanates from a previous study that compared the ability of two record review (RRR) methods, the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS) method and the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) to identify adverse event (AE) in the same sample of admissions [23]
The physicians found no no-harm incidents to add to those already found by the registered nurse (RN) in the two validation stages of the RN review process

Summary

Introduction

In contrast to other safety critical industries, well-developed systems to monitor safety within the healthcare system remain limited. The aim of the study was to evaluate retrospective record review for the detection and characterization of no-harm incidents, and compare findings with conventional incident-reporting systems Safety critical industries such as the aviation and nuclear power industries have gone far beyond healthcare services in their efforts to develop systems to monitor and improve safety. It has become widely accepted in these industries that every major incident is preceded by a number of smaller incidents, and that studying these can reveal system weaknesses that can be improved, reducing the risk of incidents or property loss. The ILCI model emphasizes the importance of managers to evaluate the management systems that influence human behavior rather than to blame individuals for committing substandard acts or allowing substandard conditions to exist [2]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion