Retrospective genotype-phenotype analysis in a 305 patient cohort referred for testing of a targeted epilepsy panel

Abstract

PurposeEpilepsy is a diverse neurological condition with extreme genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. The introduction of next-generation sequencing into the clinical laboratory has made it possible to investigate hundreds of associated genes simultaneously for a patient, even in the absence of a clearly defined syndrome. This has resulted in the detection of rare and novel mutations at a rate well beyond our ability to characterize their effects. This retrospective study reviews genotype data in the context of available phenotypic information on 305 patients spanning the epileptic spectrum to identify established and novel patterns of correlation. MethodsOur epilepsy panel comprising 377 genes was used to sequence 305 patients referred for genetic testing. Qualifying variants were annotated with phenotypic data obtained from either the test requisition form or supporting clinical documentation. Observed phenotypes were compared with established phenotypes in OMIM, published literature and the ILAEs 2010 report on genetic testing to assess congruity with known gene aberrations. ResultsWe identified a number of novel and recognized genetic variants consistent with established epileptic phenotypes. Forty-one pathogenic or predicted deleterious variants were detected in 39 patients with accompanying clinical documentation. Twenty-five of these variants across 15 genes were novel. Furthermore, evaluation of phenotype data for 194 patients with variants of unknown significance in genes with autosomal dominant and X-linked disease inheritance elucidated potentially disease-causing variants that were not currently characterized in the literature. ConclusionsAssessment of key genotype-phenotype correlations from our cohort provide insight into variant classification, as well as the importance of including ILAE recommended genes as part of minimum panel content for comprehensive epilepsy tests. Many of the reported VUSs are likely genuine pathogenic variants driving the observed phenotypes, but not enough evidence is available for assertive classifications. Similar studies will provide more utility via mounting independent genotype-phenotype data from unrelated patients. The possible outcome would be a better molecular diagnostic product, with fewer indeterminate reports containing only VUSs.