Abstract

BackgroundWidespread insecticide resistance to pyrethroids could thwart progress towards elimination. Recently, the World Health Organization has encouraged the use of non-pyrethroid insecticides to reduce the spread of insecticide resistance. An electronic tool for implementing and tracking coverage of IRS campaigns has recently been tested (mSpray), using satellite imagery to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the enumeration process. The purpose of this paper is to retrospectively analyse cross-sectional observational data to provide evidence of the epidemiological effectiveness of having introduced Actellic 300CS and the mSpray platform into IRS programmes across Zambia.MethodsHealth facility catchment areas in 40 high burden districts in 5 selected provinces were initially targeted for spraying. The mSpray platform was used in 7 districts in Luapula Province. An observational study design was used to assess the relationship between IRS exposure and confirmed malaria case incidence. A random effects Poisson model was used to quantify the effect of IRS (with and without use of the mSpray platform) on confirmed malaria case incidence over the period 2013–2017; analysis was restricted to the 4 provinces where IRS was conducted in each year 2014–2016.ResultsIRS was conducted in 283 health facility catchment areas from 2014 to 2016; 198 health facilities from the same provinces, that received no IRS during this period, served as a comparison. IRS appears to be associated with reduced confirmed malaria incidence; the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was lower in areas with IRS but without mSpray, compared to areas with no IRS (IRR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.98). Receiving IRS with mSpray significantly lowered confirmed case incidence (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66–0.86) compared to no IRS. IRS with mSpray resulted in lower incidence compared to IRS without mSpray (IRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.95).ConclusionsIRS using Actellic-CS appears to substantially reduce malaria incidence in Zambia. The use of the mSpray tool appears to improve the effectiveness of the IRS programme, possibly through improved population level coverage. The results of this study lend credence to the anecdotal evidence of the effectiveness of 3GIRS using Actellic, and the importance of exploring new platforms for improving effective population coverage of areas targeted for spraying.

Highlights

  • Widespread insecticide resistance to pyrethroids could thwart progress towards elimination

  • The Global Plan for Insecticide Resistance Management (GPIRM) of the World Health Organization (WHO) has encouraged the use of nonpyrethroid insecticides as a part of GPIRM best practices [4] to reduce the spread of insecticide resistance

  • As the effectiveness of pyrethroid-based insecticides is well documented for both long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) [1, 2, 5], and IRS is considered a costeffective vector control intervention in many settings [6], a logical step would be to assess whether adding new Third generation pyrethroid-free insecticides for IRS (3GIRS) chemicals improves malaria prevention and control practices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Widespread insecticide resistance to pyrethroids could thwart progress towards elimination. The World Health Organization has encouraged the use of non-pyrethroid insecticides to reduce the spread of insecticide resistance. Vector control through the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), and the use of indoor residual spraying (IRS), have been a cornerstone to recent malaria. Programs considering new or additional insecticides for IRS lack rigorous field-based evidence on the effectiveness of (3rd) generation pyrethroid-free insecticides for IRS (3GIRS). As the effectiveness of pyrethroid-based insecticides is well documented for both LLINs and IRS [1, 2, 5], and IRS is considered a costeffective vector control intervention in many settings [6], a logical step would be to assess whether adding new 3GIRS chemicals improves malaria prevention and control practices

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call