Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare statin prescribing practices according to the American Diabetes Association's Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2017 between diabetes patients managed by pharmacists versus those managed by internal medicine providers. A retrospective observational study was completed using the electronic health record of a multispecialty private practice. A total of 176 patients were included in the study, with 88 each in the pharmacy and internal medicine groups. Patients were ≥40 years of age with diabetes and managed by an internal medicine provider or a pharmacist between January and December 2017. Descriptive statistics, χ2, and unpaired t tests were used to describe between-group differences. More pharmacy than internal medicine patients were prescribed appropriate statin therapy (47.7 vs. 34.1%, P = 0.092), particularly those needing high-intensity statins (44.3 vs. 27.4%, P = 0.03). Females, patients 40-75 years of age, and patients with no history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the pharmacy group were more likely to receive appropriate treatment (37.5 vs. 15.0%, P = 0.022; 46.8 vs. 29.7%, P = 0.039; and 45.3 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.015, respectively). Overall, more males than females were prescribed appropriate statin therapy (53.1 vs. 26.3%, P = 0.001). Although there were no overall significant differences in statin prescribing between the pharmacy and internal medicine groups, patients needing high-intensity statins, those who were female, and those who were younger were more likely to receive appropriate therapy when managed by a pharmacist. Appropriate statin prescribing remains low among diabetes patients, and optimization of this therapy should be prioritized.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.