Retrospective analysis of the management strategies for surgical site infection post total hip or knee arthroplasty from tertiary care centres in Edmonton, Alberta

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) following hip or knee arthroplasty poses a serious health and economic burden. To evaluate SSI management strategies and outcomes to help address this problem. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of adults undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty who were identified to have a complex SSI by infection prevention and control surveillance audit. Audits identified SSI within 90 days of arthroplasty. Patients at two tertiary referral centres in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada from 2012 to 2019 were included, and SSI cases were followed for 2 years. In total, 240 SSIs were identified. Of these, 202 (84%) cases were managed with debridement with antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), of which 71% achieved cure. The use of any topical intra-operative antibiotic in DAIR was not associated with improved outcome (odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 0.91-3.10; P=0.097). DAIR performed 31-90 days after arthroplasty had a lower chance of cure compared with DAIR performed within 30 days of arthroplasty; however, this difference was not significant (60 vs 73%; P=0.123). Initial treatment failures requiring additional surgery had a 51% cure rate. The majority (78%) of treatment failures initially managed with DAIR ultimately required two-stage revision. This study provides insight from a population-based perspective into the surgical management of SSI after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty in a large cohort. Additionally, SSIs that had initial management failure were followed. These data can inform future studies, such as the economic burden associated with these infections, and may be used to plan interventions to optimize SSI management.