Retrospective analysis of odontogenic myxoma and odontogenic myxofibroma in the oral and maxillofacial region: a fibrous tissue-related differentiation

Abstract

The clinical differences between odontogenic myxoma (OM) and odontogenic myxofibroma (OMF), and the clinical significance of their classifications, remain unclear. This study reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with OM or OMF and evaluated the fibrous component of the specimens. Medical records of 21 patients with OM or OMF who underwent tumour resection were reviewed. The percentage of fibrous tissue on the representative sections was evaluated using haematoxylin and eosin- and Masson’s trichrome-stained specimens. Histopathological diagnoses included 11 OMs and 10 OMFs with no tumour recurrence except for two cases in which the dredging method was applied. More cortical bone perforation was observed in OM than in OMF cases, without significant differences. Location-locularity and apparent diffusion coefficient value (ADC)-cortical bone perforation were significantly correlated in all OM and OMF cases. The percentage of fibrous tissue in specimens showed bimodal distribution bordered by 45%. There was a significant association between diagnosis based on 45% fibrous tissue criterion and the final pathological diagnosis. Our study showed a tendency for cortical bone perforation in OM compared to OMF and correlation between ADC and cortical bone perforation. According to the histopathological analyses, the fibrous component of each case was bimodal with 45%, which may be a criterion to distinguish between OM and OMF. Accumulating knowledge, such as significant differences in prognosis, may allow for minimal surgical treatment options based on the diagnosis according to this novel histopathological criterion.