Abstract
Introduction Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN) was performed because it is considered to be less invasive than open live donor-nephrectomy (OLDN) or transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Patients and methods Between July 2001 and May 2003, 118 consecutive live donor kidney grafts were procured using RPLDN or OLDN. The patients who underwent RPLDN were divided into 2 groups: an initial group 1 (n = 38) and a subsequent group 2 (n = 48).Thirty-two patients who underwent OLDN during the same period were used as controls (group 3). The patients were placed in the lateral position. Three retroperitoneoscopic ports were inserted. The kidneys were retrieved through a 5-cm flank incision just below the 11th rib in group 1. In group 2, a 5-cm Pfannenstiel incision was used to extract the kidney. Results The operative time was 307 ± 88 minutes, 245 ± 42 minutes, and 215 ± 70 minutes in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 1 vs group 2 or 3, P < .01). The mean postoperative pentazocine (painkiller) requirements were 12 mg, 4.4 mg, and 22 mg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 2 vs group 1 or 3, P < .01). The hospital stay was 6.6 ± 1.6, 4.9 ± 0.7, and 7.0 ± 0.1 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (group 2 vs group 1 or 3, P < .01). There were no serious complication, such as massive bleeding or bowel injury. Conclusions RPLDN may be safer and less invasive than open donor nephrectomy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.