Abstract

PurposeTo verify which of the diagnostic modalities: Voiding cystouretrography (VCUG), Sonouretrography (SUG) or Magnetic resonance uretrography (MRU) is the most accurate in the assessment of urethral strictures in males and in what cases the application of novel imaging techniques benefits most.Methods55 male patients with a diagnosis of urethral stricture, were enrolled in this prospective study. Initial diagnosis of urethral stricture was based on anamnesis, uroflowmetry and VCUG. Additional imaging procedures—SUG and MRU were performed before the surgery. Virtual models and 3D printed models of the urethra with the stricture were created based on the MRU data. Exact stricture length and location were evaluated by each radiological method and accuracy was verified intraoperatively. Agreement between SUG and MRU assessments of spongiofibrosis was evaluated. MRU images were independently interpreted by two radiologists (MRU 1, MRU 2) and rater reliability was calculated.ResultsMRU was the most accurate [(95% CI 0.786–0.882), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 1.145 mm (MRU 1) and 0.727 mm (MRU 2) as compared with the operative measure. VCUG was less accurate [(95% CI 0.536–0.769), p < 0.0005] with an average underestimation of 1.509 mm as compared with operative measure. SUG was the least accurate method [(95% CI 0.510–0.776), p < 0.0005] with an average overestimation of 2.127 mm as compared with the operative measure. There was almost perfect agreement of MRU interpretations between the radiologists.ConclusionsVCUG is still considered as a ‘gold standard’ in diagnosing urethral stricture disease despite its limitations. SUG and MRU provide extra guidance in preoperative planning and should be considered as supplemental for diagnosing urethral stricture. Combination of VCUG and SUG may be an optimal set of radiological tools for diagnosing patients with urethral strictures located in the penile urethra. MRU is the most accurate method and should particularly be considered in cases of post-traumatic or multiple strictures and strictures located in the posterior urethra.

Highlights

  • Urethral stricture disease significantly impacts the patient’s quality of life

  • Between September 2017 and October 2019, 55 male patients admitted to the Urology Department of our Institution with the diagnosis of urethral stricture disease, were enrolled in this single-center prospective study

  • Accuracy of radiological methods compared to intraoperative measures are graphically presented on Fig. 2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urethral stricture disease significantly impacts the patient’s quality of life. The incidence of urethral stricture (US) related to rapid development and accessibility to minimally invasive, transurethral urological procedures as well as Extended author information available on the last page of the article urethral traumas linked to traffic or workplace accidents is increasing. The prevalence of US resulting from inflammation or traumatic catheter insertion seems to be stable [1]. Urethral dilatation and Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy (DVIU) are still repeatedly performed, despite their high failure rates. International Urology and Nephrology precise preoperative diagnostics, along with the experience of the surgeon provide excellent outcomes even in complex cases [2]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call