Retrograde inhibition of transmitter release by ATP.

Abstract

Abstract: After labelling ACh tissue stores in Torpedo electric organ prisms with radioactive acetate, the release of ACh and ATP triggered by electrical stimulation or KCI depolarization was measured in the same perfusate samples. The luciferin‐luciferase reaction for ATP was first counted, then the radioactive content of the sample determined. Further evidence showing that ATP release resulted from postsynaptic transmitter action was that carbachol could induce the release of ATP. A dose‐response curve was obtained. Curare or α‐bungarotoxin block the release of ATP elicited by carbachol. When triggered by KCI depolarization the increased efflux of ACh and ATP returned to low levels in spite of the maintained depolarization. After two successive KCI depolarizations, it was possible to dissociate the release of both substances. The efflux of ATP was exhausted while ACh release was maintained. If the second KCI depolarization was delayed ATP release recovered, but the release kinetics of ACh and ATP were sustained. The exhaustion of endogenous ATP release or the action of exogenous ATP had little or no effect on the release of ACh triggered by KCI depolarization. On the contrary, the release of ACh induced by electrical stimulation was sensitive to the action of adenine nucleotides, and a quantitative estimation of the inhibition of ACh release by ATP and adenosine could be made. At the onset of stimulation ATP release predominated, being gradually replaced by adenosine, which can be reuptaken. This would terminate the inhibitory action of the nucleotide. Carbachol inhibits evoked ACh release, while the effect of α‐bungarotoxin was to increase spontaneous ACh release. These effects could be respectively mediated by an increased or a reduced release of ATP resulting from the postsynaptic action of ACh agonists or antagonists. However, a direct presynaptic effect of these substances is not excluded. It seems possible that the action of ATP on ACh release can be explained through its inhibition of the depolarization‐evoked Ca2+ entry.