Abstract
ObjectiveDespite many efforts to prevent ureteric stenosis in a transplanted kidney, this complication occurs in 3–5% of renal transplant recipients. Balloon dilatation (BD) is a possible minimally invasive approach for treatment, but reports to date refer only to the antegrade approach; we analysed our experience with retrograde BD (RBD) and reviewed previous reports. Patients and methodsFrom October 2008 to February 2011, eight patients after renal transplantation (RTX) underwent RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at our hospital. We retrospectively analysed the outcome and reviewed previous reports. ResultsThe eight recipients (five men and three women; median age 55years, range 38–69) were treated with one or two RBDs for transplant ureteric stenosis. There were no complications. The median (range) time after RTX was 4.5 (2.5–11)months. Long-term success was only achieved in one recipient, while five patients were re-operated on (three with a new implant, two by replacement of transplanted ureter with ileum) after a median (range) of 2.8 (0.7–7.0)months after unsuccessful RBD(s). For two recipients the success remained unclear (one graft loss due to other reasons, one result pending). When the first RBD was unsuccessful there was no improvement with a second. ConclusionRBD is technically feasible, but our findings and the review of previous reports on antegrade ureteric dilatation suggest that the success rate is low when the ureter is dilated at ⩾10weeks after RTX. From our results we cannot recommend RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at ⩾10weeks after RTX, while previous reports show favourable results of antegrade BD in the initial 3months after RTX.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.